Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 10;6(15):5459–5472. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2294

Table 2.

Test of local adaptation after controlling for site‐of‐origin and planting site effect. Generalized linear models testing for Sympatric versus Allopatric (SA), the difference between the average fitness in sympatric combinations and the average fitness in allopatric combinations. Differences in SA are indicated by the “Home versus Away (HA)” term, whereas the other terms test for site‐of‐origin and planting site effects. Data were considered as a binomial (survival) or continuous (other traits). For survival, significance is based on the likelihood ratio (G), while for the continuous variables, it is based on an F test

Trait Time scored Population (df = 7) Planting site (df = 6/7)a HA (df = 1) Error df
G/F b P G/F P G/F P
Survival Transplant 75.098 <0.001 35.478 <0.001 0.097 0.756 112
Spring 8.868 0.262 32.69 <0.001 0.043 0.836 109
Autumn 18.522 0.010 97.18 <0.001 0.222 0.638 96
Width Transplant 10.087 <0.001 0.891 0.517 1.432 0.234 102
Spring 5.269 <0.001 10.943 <0.001 1.568 0.213 96
Autumn 2.277 0.046 7.846 <0.001 0.017 0.898 42
Height Transplant 2.973 0.007 2.269 0.035 0.002 0.964 102
Spring 1.006 0.432 1.545 0.161 0.121 0.729 112
Autumn 1.81 0.111 3.794 0.004 0.201 0.657 42
Biomass
Fresh weight Autumn 1.523 0.163 7.191 <0.001 0.751 0.387 162
Dry weight Autumn 1.365 0.224 1.074 0.380 0.698 0.405 159
a

df = 7 except for autumn (width, height) and weight traits when df = 6.

b

G statistic for survival, F test for other traits.