Table 4.

Models Evaluating Implicit and Explicit Alcohol Approach as Predictors of Subsequent Drinking Outcomes

	Logistic portion of model			Count portion of model
	Exp (b)	Z	95% CI	Exp (b)	Z	95% CI
DV = Consumption
Sex	0.66	−2.14*	0.45–0.97	0.97	−0.43	0.86–1.10
Previous Consumption	0.19	−2.85**	0.06–0.59	1.06	11.39***	1.05–1.07
Time	0.94	−1.29	0.87–1.03	0.99	−0.91	0.97–1.01
Explicit Approach	0.64	−6.43***	0.56–0.74	1.11	6.85***	1.08–1.15
Approach IAT	0.76	−0.98	0.45–1.31	1.07	0.92	0.92–1.24
DV = RAPI
Sex	0.67	−1.99*	0.45–0.99	0.99	−0.16	0.83–1.17
Previous RAPI	0.37	−8.11***	0.29–0.47	1.09	11.08***	1.07–1.10
Time	0.92	−1.73	0.84–1.01	0.97	−1.54	0.94–1.01
Explicit Approach	0.74	−5.90***	0.66–0.81	1.09	3.74***	1.04–1.14
Approach IAT	0.70	−1.24	0.40–1.23	0.88	−1.33	0.73–1.06
DV =AUDIT
Sex	0.76	−1.08	0.47–1.24	0.97	−0.81	0.90–1.05
Previous AUDIT	0.04	−6.44***	0.01–0.10	1.11	15.04***	1.09–1.12
Time	0.94	−1.16	0.84–1.05	1.01	0.98	0.99–1.02
Explicit Approach	0.50	−3.59***	0.34–0.73	1.08	7.90***	1.06–1.11
Approach IAT	1.32	1.00	0.76–2.30	1.03	0.60	0.94–1.13

Note. N = 506. Sex was coded 0 = men, women = 1. Approach IAT = scores on the Implicit Association Test; higher scores indicate stronger alcohol approach associations. Bolded values indicate statistically significant IAT scores. Explicit approach = scores on the inclined/indulgent subscale; higher scores indicate stronger alcohol approach inclinations. Both the IAT and the explicit measure were lagged; models predict outcomes one time point later Consumption = self-reported number of drinks consumed on a typical week. RAPI = scores on the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index. AUDIT = scores on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test. Exp (b) = the exponentiated coefficient.

^***p < .001.

^**p < .01.

^*p < .05.