Table 6.
Logistic portion of model | Count portion of model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Exp (b) | Z | 95% CI | Exp (b) | Z | 95% CI | |
Lag 2 (n = 386) |
Sex | 0.61 | −2.20* | 0.40–0.95 | 0.96 | −0.50 | 0.83–1.12 |
Previous Consumption | 0.40 | −3.60*** | 0.25–0.66 | 1.07 | 13.18*** | 1.06–1.08 | |
Time | 0.89 | −2.37* | 0.81–0.98 | 0.96 | −2.20* | 0.93–1.00 | |
Identity IAT | 1.01 | 0.03 | 0.64–1.60 | 1.25 | 2.80** | 1.07–1.47 | |
Excitement IAT | 0.92 | −0.40 | 0.60–1.40 | 1.17 | 2.13* | 1.01–1.36 | |
Approach IAT | 0.51 | −2.50* | 0.30–0.86 | 1.03 | 0.38 | 0.88–1.21 | |
| |||||||
Lag 3 (n = 379) |
Sex | 0.50 | −2.42* | 0.28–0.88 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.84–1.20 |
Previous Consumption | 0.18 | −1.12 | 0.01–3.71 | 1.07 | 8.88*** | 1.05–1.08 | |
Time | 0.92 | −1.11 | 0.80–1.06 | 0.99 | −0.28 | 0.94–1.04 | |
Identity IAT | 1.42 | 1.29 | 0.83–2.40 | 1.33 | 2.85** | 1.09–1.61 | |
Excitement IAT | 0.66 | −1.47 | 0.38–1.15 | 1.15 | 1.52 | 0.96–1.37 | |
Approach IAT | 0.50 | −1.97* | 0.25–1.00 | 0.99 | −0.05 | 0.81–1.22 | |
| |||||||
Lag 4 (n = 363) |
Sex | 0.51 | −2.28* | 0.29–0.91 | 0.92 | −0.74 | 0.75–1.14 |
Previous Consumption | 0.26 | −1.92 | 0.07–1.03 | 1.06 | 8.44*** | 1.05–1.07 | |
Time | 0.89 | −1.37 | 0.76–1.05 | 0.97 | −0.93 | 0.91–1.03 | |
Identity IAT | 1.36 | 1.01 | 0.75–2.47 | 1.28 | 2.20* | 1.03–1.59 | |
Excitement IAT | 0.91 | −0.30 | 0.49–1.68 | 1.16 | 1.52 | 0.96–1.42 | |
Approach IAT | 0.49 | −1.95 | 0.24–1.00 | 0.98 | −0.16 | 0.80–1.20 | |
| |||||||
Lag 5 (n = 344) |
Sex | 0.57 | −1.85 | 0.32–1.04 | 1.00 | −0.01 | 0.81–1.24 |
Previous Consumption | 0.35 | −3.49*** | 0.19–0.63 | 1.06 | 8.24*** | 1.04–1.07 | |
Time | 0.82 | −1.69 | 0.66–1.03 | 0.99 | −0.20 | 0.91–1.08 | |
Identity IAT | 1.91 | 1.95 | 1.00–3.66 | 1.44 | 3.25** | 1.16–1.80 | |
Excitement IAT | 0.91 | −0.29 | 0.49–1.71 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.82–1.31 | |
Approach IAT | 0.48 | −2.03* | 0.23–0.97 | 1.19 | 1.32 | 0.92–1.55 | |
| |||||||
Lag 6 (n = 315) |
Sex | 0.60 | −1.56 | 0.32–1.14 | 1.06 | 0.49 | 0.83–1.36 |
Previous Consumption | 0.45 | −4.23*** | 0.31–0.65 | 1.04 | 5.99*** | 1.03–1.06 | |
Time | 0.79 | −1.15 | 0.53–1.18 | 1.04 | 0.45 | 0.88–1.23 | |
Identity IAT | 1.70 | 1.49 | 0.85–3.42 | 1.38 | 2.60** | 1.08–1.76 | |
Excitement IAT | 0.97 | −0.10 | 0.50–1.87 | 1.21 | 1.59 | 0.96–1.52 | |
Approach IAT | 0.65 | −1.01 | 0.28–1.50 | 1.08 | 0.52 | 0.81–1.45 | |
| |||||||
Lag 7 (n = 276) |
Sex | 0.79 | −0.70*** | 0.40–1.54 | 0.86 | −1.20 | 0.68–1.10 |
Previous Consumption | 0.51 | −4.76*** | 0.38–0.67 | 1.04 | 5.48*** | 1.02–1.05 | |
Identity IAT | 1.14 | 0.31 | 0.50–2.61 | 1.50 | 2.86** | 1.14–1.99 | |
Excitement IAT | 0.68 | −1.01 | 0.32–1.45 | 1.19 | 1.30 | 0.92–1.54 | |
Approach IAT | 0.62 | −0.96 | 0.24–1.63 | 0.99 | −0.09 | 0.73–1.34 |
Note. N = 506. Sex was coded 0 = men, women = 1. IAT = Implicit Association Test. IATs were scored such that higher scores indicate stronger associations with the concepts in the IAT’s name. Bolded values indicate statistically significant IAT scores Consumption = self-reported number of drinks consumed on a typical week. Lagged models were run such that each possible lag (from 2 to 7) was evaluated using the following strategy: Tj+2 drinking = Tj IATs, where j = a given assessment time point. Exp (b) = the exponentiated coefficient.
p < .001.
p < .01.
p < .05.