Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 27;90(16):7368–7387. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00898-16

TABLE 1.

Active concentrations of selected hit compounds against different viral targetsa,g

Viral target GRP-71271
GRP-103594
GRP-115249
EC50 (μM) EC90 (μM) EC50 (μM) EC90 (μM) EC50 (μM) EC90 (μM)
IAV-WSN (H1N1)b 0.17 (0.11–0.25) 0.34 (0.16–0.73) 0.28 (0.15–0.51) 0.36 (0.30–0.43) 0.38 (0.36–0.39) 0.84 (0.73–0.97)
IAV-WSN-nanoLuc (H1N1)c 0.05 (0.03–0.08) 0.310 (0.21–0.45) 0.02 (0.01–0.04) 0.321 (0.26–0.38) 0.06 (0.04–0.09) 0.46 (0.31–0.69)
IAV-NL-nanoLuc (H1N1)c 0.20 (0.15–0.27) 0.55 (0.30–1.00) 0.09 (0.05–0.16) 0.42 (0.12–1.40) 0.03 (0.01–0.08) 0.25 (0.09–0.70)
A/Mallard/Potsdam/83 (H2N2)b 5.36 (3.11–9.30) 15.5 (3.6–50.5) >20d >10e
A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2)b,e >10 >10 >10
A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2)b,e >10 >10 >10
A/Wyoming/03/2003 (H3N2)b,e >10 >10 >10
A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2)b,e >10 >10 >10
Measles viruse,f >10 >10 >10
Respiratory syncytial viruse,f >10 >10 >10
Sindbis virusb,e >10 >10 >10
Vaccinia virusb,e >10 >10 >10
Vesicular stomatitis virusc,e >10 >10 >10
a

Values represent three independent repeats and were calculated through four-parameter variable-slope regression modeling. Values in parentheses specify 95% confidence intervals.

b

Data are based on plaque titers.

c

Data are based on relative RLUs.

d

The highest concentration assessed was 20 μM.

e

The highest concentration assessed was 10 μM.

f

Data are based on TCID50 values.

g

For IAVs, the CC50 value as assessed on BEAS-2B cells was >100 μM (the highest concentration assessed was 100 μM) for all three compounds, and the SI values were >500, >1,100, and >3,300 for GRP-71271, GRP-103594, and GRP-115249, respectively.