Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 27;90(16):7066–7083. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00306-16

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Killing rates predicted by equation 17. (a) The red line depicts K1 for K2 = 0 as a function of ρ, the blue line K2 for K1 = 0 (see equations 18a and b, respectively), and the black line is just the line K = K1 = K2 = ρ. (b) K2 is depicted as a function of K1 for ρ = 1, using equation 17b for the early killing parameters, d1 = γ = d2 = 1 (in red), and for the late killing parameters, d1 = 0.1, γ = 1, and d2 = 2 day−1 (in blue). Note that we indeed predict that the lines cross at K1 = K2 = ρ = 1. The lines are solid when 0.5 < δ < 1.5 and dashed otherwise. (c) We make small steps through the parameter space for 0.01 ≤ d1, d2 ≤ 5, and 0.5 ≤ ρ ≤ 1, drawing a random value for either K1 or K2 from a uniform distribution, 0 < K1, K2 < 10, and use equation 17a or b to compute the other killing rate. This analysis is performed for γ = 1, and we increase the parameters by 10% when we step through the parameter space. Here, we are more strict and only accept solutions when 0.75 < δ < 1.25 (in the presence and absence of CTL).