TABLE V.
Example checklist for preparation of patient data set for treatment planning suggested by failure modes in steps 18–21, 34, 45, 37, and 49–79 of Appendix C1 (Ref. 141).
| Image datasets input into the planning process are checked for correct dataset choice (correct study of the correct patient), documentation, quality, etc. |
| Documentation of isocenter coordinates, measurements, patient positioning, etc. from the simulator is provided |
| Images verified for correct orientation |
| For image registration cases: Primary and secondary datasets (for registration) selected, achieved registration accuracy noted |
| Deviations or compromises in the registration are noted |
| Organs at risk are contoured according to departmental guidelines |
| Correctness of all 3-D representations (voxel descriptions, surfaces, etc.) is verified |
| Expansion of GTV to CTV follows site-specific protocols; automated margins worked correctly; variations noted |
| Expansion of CTV to PTV follows site-specific protocol; automated margins worked properly; variations noted |
| Boolean structure checks: Input to structures checked, regions created visually reviewed |
| Image artifacts (e.g., contrast, metal) corrected per department protocols |
| Patient support devices (e.g., immobilization, skin markers, couches) are correctly included or excluded |
| Treatment planning instructions are clear and unambiguous |
| Preliminary prescription written |
| Optimization goals and limits are specified, and applicable departmental or other protocols are used |
| Special instructions are written as in the department policy |
| Initial directive includes statement of previous treatment, review of previous treatments requested; the prescription accounts for any previous treatments |