TABLE VI.
Example checklist for physics check of treatment plan suggested by FMEA failure modes of steps 81–173, Appendix C1 (Ref. 141).
| Dose prescription and planning constraints used for planning/optimization are consistent with site-specific protocol (example checklist 1) or with plan directive |
| Correct selection of ROIs: Correct use of overlapping and non-overlapping structures in optimization; best choices of beam energies and modalities have been made |
| Doses from previous treatments were accounted for in the plan |
| Optimization goals were achieved or failure understood, discussed with the radiation oncologist and acknowledged □ Yes □ No |
| Dose calculation algorithm and density correction (algorithm, on/off) are correctly chosen |
| Dose distribution is reasonable for the plan and anatomy |
| 1. PTV coverage consistent with initial planning directive or site-specific protocol (example checklist 1) or deviations discussed with the physician(s) and formally accepted |
| □ Yes □ No |
| 2. The doses to OARs within tolerances (as specified by site-specific protocol) or deviations reviewed with physician(s) and formally accepted |
| □ Yes □ No |
| Plan agrees qualitatively with experience in similar cases |
| Overall plan includes separate boost or concomitant boost doses per prescription. |
| Plan accounts for specified immobilization, localization, and positioning methods |
| Verify documentation of use of bolus, type, and location |
| Verify that beams are deliverable |
| 1. Deliverable MLC patterns used in the final plan; leaf-sequencing parameters correct |
| 2. Monitor units within deliverable ranges |
| The plan prescription and treatment plan information have been downloaded to the correct course in the delivery system database |
| 4D plan remains within the reliability limits of the system |