Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 15;11(8):e0159630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159630

Table 3. Availability of terrestrial habitat types and their uses as feeding spots by lesser black-backed gulls tagged in the colony on Spiekeroog from 17 May to 4 June 2010.

Test Habitat type Availability Feeding spots Proportional use Χ2 p
Open vegetation vs. ground-covering vegetation Overall 1292 38 - 26.00 <0.001
Ground-covering vegetationa 1016 17 0.569 - -
No/little vegetationb 276 21 2.587 - -
Various habitats Overall 1292 38 - 142.27 <0.001
Grasslanda 824 17 0.701 5.96 0.019
Potatob 12 6 17.000 91.20 <0.001
Waste disposal 0 1 - - -
Corn 248 12 1.645 3.76 0.062
Water body 2 0 - - -
Summer wheat 3 0 - - -
Rye 15 0 0.000 0.45 1.000
Construction area 6 1 5.667 3.86 0.161
Ploughed soil 5 1 6.800 4.97 0.141
Winter wheat 90 0 0.000 2.85 0.109
Fallow land 6 0 0.000 0.18 1.000
Pea 2 0 - - -
Barley 61 0 0.000 1.88 0.258
Oat 8 0 0.000 0.24 1.000
Rape 10 0 0.000 0.30 1.000

Proportional use values indicate relative preference (> 1) or avoidance (< 1) of habitats. Significant differences (bold) were tested using Monte Carlo permutation tests (level of significance = 0.05). Tests were only performed for habitat types with an availability >4.

aused less than available on average,

bused more than available on average.