Table 5.

TRQ Results for AAC Comparing First and Last Instances for 15 participants Who Completed Multiple TRQs. Means and 95% Confidence Intervals

	First of Multiple Responses	Last of Multiple Responses
1. I was comfortable being evaluated through this means.	5.1 (4.5,5.7)	5.7 (5.4,5.9)
2. The results of the evaluation through the tele-video conference would be as accurate as an evaluation being completed in-person by a certified practitioner.	5.2 (4.6,5.8)	5.4 (4.9,5.8)
3. All areas of my lifestyle were considered with this process.	5.1 (4.4,5.8)	5.3 (4.8,5.9)
4. The technology did not interfere with the assessment	4.9 (4.1,5.6)	5.0 (4.2,5.8)
5. The quality and clarity of the video and audio were acceptable	5.0 (4.4,5.6)	5.2 (4.6,5.8)
6. Consulting with an expert clinician through tele-video conferencing saved me monetary expenses (i.e. travel time, gas, taking off of work, family, etc.)	5.4 (4.8,5.9)	5.7 (5.5,6.0)
7. I would be willing to use this tele-video evaluation process again	5.6 (5.2,6.0)	5.7 (5.3,6.0)