Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 19;115(4):425–430. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.207

Table 3. Performance of the careHPV and INNO-LiPA assays for the diagnosis of CIN2+ lesions (n=943).

  Burkina Faso (CIN2+, n=9) South Africa (CIN2+, n=51) Overall (CIN2+, n=60)
  careHPV INNO-LiPA careHPV INNO-LiPA careHPV INNO-LiPA
Performance indicators
No. of positive tests 206 300 222 358 428 658
No. of CIN2+ positive by test 9 8 47 50 56 58
Sensitivity % 100 (66.4–100) 88.9 (51.7–99.7) 92.2 (81.1–97.8) 98.0 (89.6–99.6) 93.3 (83.8–98.2) 96.7 (88.5–99.6)
Specificity % 54.7 (49.9–59.5) 32.9 (28.5–37.5) 60.9 (56.3–65.5) 31.3 (27.0–35.8) 57.9 (54.5–61.2) 32.0 (29.0–35.2)
PPV % 4.4 (2.0–8.1) 2.7 (1.2–5.2) 21.2 (16.0–27.1) 14.0 (10.6–18.0) a
NPV % 100 (98.5–100) 99.3 (96.2–100) 98.6 (96.3–99.6) 99.3 (96.1–100)

Abbreviations: CIN=cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; HPV=human papillomavirus.

a

PPV (positive predictive value) and NPV (negative predictive value) have not been combined for the two countries as they depend on disease prevalence/incidence which are different for each country.