Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 16;6:31558. doi: 10.1038/srep31558

Table 2. A summary of the comparison of ab initio predicted proteomes between Hordeum and other plant species.

Plant species* Cv. Clipper
LR Sahara
Reference
#hits %hits #hits %hits
Amborella trichopoda 18,574 69.2 18,604 69.3 59
Aquilegia coerulea 21,480 86.5 21,534 86.8 Aquilegia coerulea Genome Sequencing Project, http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/
Arabidopsis thaliana 23,111 84.3 23,166 84.5 60
Brachypodium distachyon 25,106 94.6 25,151 94.7 61
Eucalyptus grandis 30,554 84.0 30,582 84.1 62
Hordeum vulgare cv. Barke 103,719 61.7 101,799 60.5 63
Hordeum vulgare cv. Bowman 119,845 52.6 118,472 52.0 63
Hordeum vulgare cv. Morex 109,745 57.2 108,741 56.7 63
Medicago truncatula 25,115 56.9 25,154 57.0 64
Oryza sativa 28,446 72.8 28,534 73.1 65
Populus trichocarpa 34,478 83.4 34,489 83.4 66
Sorghum bicolor 26,419 95.7 26,442 95.8 67
Zea mays 62,166 70.0 62,311 70.2 68

OrthoFinder (v0.2.823) species pair-wise BLASTP protein sequence comparisons of Hordeum vulgare cv. Clipper and LR Sahara were used against other sequenced plant species. Source: Phytozome (http://www.phytozome.net version 10.2). Augustus (v2.5.5) was used to construct de novo predicted proteomes unless proteome predictions were already available. Pairwise species blast was performed using NCBI BLAST+ v2.2.29.