Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 4;46(4):1076–1095. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct205

Table 3.

Full and competing model path analysis results

Outcome variable Independent variable b SE b B
Full model
 Emotional exhaustion(T2) Work–family conflict(T1) 0.65 0.20 0.24***
 Emotional exhaustion(T2) Role conflict(T1) 0.21 0.10 0.16*
 Emotional exhaustion(T2) Role ambiguity(T1) 0.26 0.16 0.12
 Depersonalisation(T2) Emotional exhaustion(T2) 0.21 0.04 0.46***
 Depersonalisation(T2) Work–family conflict(T1) 0.02 0.11 0.02
 Depersonalisation(T2) Role conflict(T1) –0.06 0.05 –0.10
 Depersonalisation(T2) Role ambiguity(T1) 0.10 0.09 0.10
 Work withdrawal(T3) Emotional exhaustion(T2) 0.21 0.05 0.42***
 Work withdrawal(T3) Depersonalisation(T2) 0.10 0.10 0.09
 Work withdrawal(T3) Tenure(T1) 0.05 0.09 0.06
 Work withdrawal(T3) Sex(T1) –1.70 1.15 –0.12
 Work withdrawal(T3) Age(T1) –0.13 0.05 –0.27*
 Exit(T3) Work withdrawal(T3) 0.35 0.12 0.28***
 Exit(T3) Emotional exhaustion(T2) 0.16 0.06 0.27**
 Exit(T3) Depersonalisation(T2) 0.25 0.12 0.19*
 Exit(T3) Age(T1) 0.05 0.07 0.08
 Exit(T3) Sex(T1) 0.63 1.41 0.04
 Exit(T3) Tenure(T1) –0.12 0.11 –0.12
Trimmed model
 Emotional exhaustion(T2) Work–family conflict(T1) 0.67 0.20 0.25***
 Emotional exhaustion(T2) Role conflict(T1) 0.23 0.10 0.17**
 Depersonalisation(T2) Emotional exhaustion(T2) 0.20 0.04 0.46***
 Work withdrawal(T3) Emotional exhaustion(T2) 0.22 0.04 0.46***
 Work withdrawal(T3) Age(T1) –0.10 0.04 –0.23**
 Exit(T3) Work withdrawal(T3) 0.33 0.11 0.26**
 Exit(T3) Depersonalisation(T2) 0.23 0.12 0.18*
 Exit(T3) Emotional exhaustion(T2) 0.17 0.06 0.29**

*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001. Full model R2: emotional exhaustion (T2) = 0.14, depersonali-sation(T2) = 0.22, work withdrawal(T3) = 0.29, exit(T3) = 0.35. Trimmed model R2: emotional exhaustion(T2) = 0.12, depersonalisation(T2) = 0.21, work withdrawal(T3) = 0.26, exit(T3) = 0.34.