Table 5.
Tabulated statistical evaluation of the responses and validation of experimental design
|
A. Summary of each factor effect on responses Y
1 ,
Y
2
and
Y3 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACTOR | Y 1 | Y 2 | Y 3 | |||||||||
| Factor effect | P value | Factor effect | P value | Factor effect | P value | |||||||
| X1 | -0.020 | 0.0133 | 2.21 | 0.0013 | 0.13 | 0.0508 | ||||||
| X2 | -38.3 | 0.9756 | 1.68 | 0.0016 | 0.23 | 0.0128 | ||||||
| X1X2 | 1.56 | 0.0034 | -0.29 | 0.0036 | -0.15 | 0.0673 | ||||||
| X12 | -.358 | 0.1064 | -6.56 | 0.3303 | 0.20 | 0.0716 | ||||||
| X22 | -1.06 | 0.0281 | -0.69 | 0.0003 | 0.21 | 0.7957 | ||||||
|
B. Model summary statistics for quadratic response surface model | ||||||||||||
| RESPONSE FACTOR | F-value | P>F | R 2 | Adequate precision | C.V | |||||||
| Y1 | 13.65 | 0.0133 | 0.9317 | 11.406 | 1.66 | |||||||
| Y2 | 110.56 | 0.0013 | 0.9946 | 30.934 | 0.69 | |||||||
| Y3 | 10.80 | 0.0391 | 0.9474 | 8.786 | 1.92 | |||||||
|
C. Validation of experimental design by evaluation of extra design check point formulation N10 | ||||||||||||
| Evaluation parameters | Predicted value | Actual value | % Error | Evaluation parameters | Predicted value | |||||||
| Particle size (nm) | 167.03 | 164.6 | 1.823 | Particle size (nm) | 167.03 | |||||||
| % Entrapment efficiency | 74.38 | 72.65 | 2.381 | % Entrapment efficiency | 74.38 | |||||||
| % CDR after 12 hrs | 91.39 | 91.23 | 0.175 | % CDR after 12 hrs | 91.39 | |||||||