Table 2.
Evidence synthesis framework—key features of forms of evidence synthesis outputs
Evidence synthesis outputs based on a broad thematic overview |
Evidence synthesis outputs based on a specific question |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commonly used name | Annotated bibliography | Evidence map | Scoping review | State of the art review | Rapid review | Literature review | Review of reviews | Evidence paper | Mixed methods research synthesis | Systematic review |
Also known as | Mapping review | Critical review | Knowledge summary | Evidence summary | Overview | Umbrella review | Evidence briefing | Multi-arm systematic review | ||
Systematic map | Scoping study | Rapid evidence assessment | Overview of reviews | Briefing note | Mixed studies review | |||||
Interim evidence assessment | Evidence to policy brief | |||||||||
Brief review | Evidence brief | |||||||||
Strategy brief | Research summary | |||||||||
Description | A list of key literature and/or sources, primarily of research evidence with expanded summaries on the main content | A map of the existing research evidence base to provide an overview of key themes and/ or results and identify research gaps | An overview of research undertaken on a (constrained) topic, when time and other constraints are limited | A brief review primarily of recent research evidence | A quick review of key, easily accessible evidence, from research and other sources, on a particular (constrained) topic | An overview and synthesis primarily of research evidence with key conclusions | Includes existing reviews, preferably systematic rather than primary studies, and draws a conclusion statement | An extensive overview of available and accessible evidence—both peer reviewed and significant grey literature—primarily from research | A full map and synthesis of different types of research evidence—both quantitative and qualitative—to answer a research question and subquestions | An exhaustive and robust review and synthesis of research evidence |
Often produced for a specific, time bound purpose | Often produced for a specific, time bound purpose | Often produced for a specific, time bound purpose | May include a consensus statement drawing on practice-based evidence | Often produced for a specific, time bound purpose | Is likely to include a critical appraisal of research | Includes a balanced, objective assessment and critical appraisal of the evidence | May include statistical meta-analysis of quantitative medical research and a synthesis of qualitative data | Includes a map of evidence, critical appraisal and qualitative or quantitative evidence synthesis | ||
May give an indication of areas of consensus and debate | Includes a commentary on evidence | Mixed methods research syntheses include realist reviews and meta-narrative reviews | Includes the criteria (e.g. quality, date range, method) applied to select evidence for synthesis | |||||||
Includes peer-reviewed literature and is likely to include grey literature | May consider local context and cost effectiveness | Incorporates peer-reviewed and significant grey literature | ||||||||
Draws a clear scientific conclusion |