Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jun 11;272(7):1577–1586. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3104-5

Table 2.

Population characteristics in the 12 studies from the literature comparing TT vs TT/PND

Study (LE) Study design No of
patients
Mean age TT
vs TT/PND (years)
T classiffication Follow-up TT
vs TT/PND (months)
Lang et al. [17] (LE 2) Meta-analysis 3,331 T1, T2, T3, T4 50.8 vs 45.2
Wang et al. [28] (LE 4) Meta-analysis 2,318 46.7 vs 50.5 T1, T2, T3, T4 12–144 vs 3–159 ns
Barczynski et al. [10] (LE 4) Retrospective 640 52.7 T1, T2, T3, T4 128 vs 126 ns
Popadich et al. [13] (LE 4) Retrospective 606 48 vs 44 T1b, T2, T3, T4 50 vs 32 ns
Sywak et al. [36] (LE 4) Retrospective 447 42.6 vs 39.1 T1b, T2 70 vs 24.5 ns
Zuniga et al. [32] (LE 4) Retrospective 266 41.5 vs 42.9 T1, T2, T3, T4 6.1
Hartl et al. [12] (LE 4) Retrospective 263 46 vs 47 T1b, T2, T3 74 vs 83 ns
Costa et al. [27] (LE 3) Retrospective 244 52 vs 46 T2, T3, T4 47 vs 62
So et al. [35] (LE 4) Retrospective 232 49.8 vs 49.2 45.4 vs 44.7 ns
Raffaelli et al. [20] (LE 3) Prospective 186 42 vs 43.2 T1, T2, T3 25 vs 25.5 ns
Lang et al. [19] (LE 4) Retrospective 185 50 vs 52 T1, T2, T3, T4 31.9 vs 28.2
Hughes et al. [18] (LE 4) Retrospective 143 41.2 vs 46.8 T1a, T2 27.5 vs 19 ns
Moo et al. [16] (LE 4) Retrospective 81 49.2 vs 45.7 T1, T2 37.2 vs 37.2

LE level of evidence, TT total thyroidectomy, PND prophylactic neck dissection, ns not signifcant