Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 16.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jun 11;272(7):1577–1586. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3104-5

Table 3.

Oncologic results and outcomes from the 12 studies comparing TT vs TT/PND

Study (LE) No. of TT vs TT/PND I131 (%) pN1 (%) Recurrence (%)
TT vs TT/PND
Pre-ablative negative Tg level
(%) or means of Tg levels TT
vs TT/PND (ng/mL)
Undetectable final Tg (%)
TT vs TT/PND or means of
Tg levels TT vs TT/PND
(ng/mL)
Lang et al. [17] (LE 2) TT: 1,739 62 8.6 vs 4.7
TT/PND: 1,592
Wang et al. [28] (LE 4) TT: 995 7.9
TT/PND: 745 4.7
Central bilateral ns
Barczynski et al. [10] (LE 4) TT: 282 48.4 30 13.1 89.4 1.8 ng/mL
TT/PND: 358 4.2 94.4 0.04 ng/mL
Central bilateral p < 0.001 p = 0.018 p = 0.005
Popadich et al. [13] (LE 4) TT: 347 98 49 8.1 7.2 ng/mL
TT/PND: 259 5 1.9 ng/mL
Central bilateral 22 % p = 0.11 p = 0.025 ns
Unilateral 78 %
Sywak et al. [36] (LE 4) TT: 391 100 38 5.6 43 %
TT/PND: 56 3.6 72 %
Central unilateral p = 0.001
Zuniga et al. [32] (LE 4) TT: 130 70 82.3 19 vs 14
TT/PND: 136 ns
Central bilateral
Hartl et al. [12] (LE 4) TT: 91 100 52 20 43 84 %
TT/PND: 155 7.7 65 93 %
Central bilateral + lateral
 ipsilateral
p = 0.005 p = 0.001 p = 0.03
Costa et al. [27] (LE 3) TT: 118 61 46.8 7.6 vs 6.3
TT/PND: 126 ns
Central unilateral or bilateral
So et al. [35] (LE 4) TT: 113 83 37 3.5 vs 1.7 2.24 ng/mL 0.69 ng/mL
TT/PND: 119 ns 1.07 ng/mL 0.44 ng/mL
Central bilateral p < 0.022 ns
Raffaelli et al. [20] (LE 3) TT: 62 35.5 0 vs 0.8
TT/PND: 124 ns ns
Central unilateral or bilateral
Lang et al. [19] (LE 4) TT: 103 67 54.9 2.9 vs 3.7 22.3 <0.5 ng/mL
TT/PND: 82 ns 51.2 <0.5 ng/mL
Central unilateral p < 0.024 ns
Hughes et al. [18] (LE4) TT:65 86 vs 92 62 4.6 15 77 %
TT/PND: 78 5.1 10 75 %
Central bilateral ns ns ns
Moo et al. [16] (LE 4) TT: 36 70 33.3 16.7 vs 4.4
TT/PND: 45 ns
Central bilateral

LE level of evidence, TT total thyroidectomy, TT/PND total thyroidectomy with prophylactic neck dissection, Tg thyroglobulin