Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 4;5(3):187–200. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i3.187

Table 6.

Value of cytokine concentrations for predicting mortality

Ref. Design No pts. Mortality n (%) Follow-up Diagnostic tests Predicts mortality Results
IL-6
Bogner et al[36] P-coh 58 11 (19%) 90 d Y [IL-6] is significantly higher in non-survivors at 0 + 6 h
Cuschieri et al[34] P-coh 152 4 (5%) In-hospital N [IL-6] is not significantly higher in non-survivors
Dresing et al[26] P-coh 30 6 (19%) 29 d Y [IL-6] is significantly higher in non-survivors on days 3 + 5
Frink et al[3] P-coh 143 21 (15%) In-hospital > 2176.0 pg/mL: Sensitivity 28.6%, specificity 100% on day 1 Y [IL-6] is highly predictive for non-survival (AUC ROC 0.858)
Frangen et al[59] P-cc 71 16 (22%) In-hospital Y [IL-6] is significantly higher in non-survivors
Gebhard et al[40] P-coh 94 18 (19%) In-hospital Y [IL-6] is significantly higher in non-survivors at 4 + 6 + 12 h post injury
Maier et al[27] P-coh 251 29 (12%) In-hospital AUC ROC 0.60 N [IL-6] is not predictive for non-survival
Sousa et al[51] P-coh 99 28 (28%) 72 h > 276 pg/mL: AUC ROC2 0,775 (95%CI: 0.591-0.960) Y [IL-6] > 276 pg/mL is significantly correlated with non-survival
Svoboda et al[62] P-cc 42 11 (26%) In-hospital > 400 pg/mL has a sensitivity of 100% Y [IL-6] > 400 pg/mL is significantly correlated with non-survival
Yagmur et al[63] P-cc 99 17 (17%) 60 d Y [IL-6] is significantly elevated in non-survivors
IL-8
Bogner et al[36] P-coh 58 11 (19%) 90 d Y [IL-8] is significantly higher in non-survivors at 6 + 24 h
Liener et al[43] P-coh 94 18 (19%) 15 d Y [IL-8] is significantly higher in non-survivors from 30 min-24 h
Maier et al[27] P-coh 251 29 (12%) In-hospital AUC ROC 0.45 N [IL-8] is not predictive for non-survival
Yagmur et al[63] P-cc 99 17 (17%) 60 d Y [IL-8] is significantly elevated in non-survivors
IL-10
Bogner et al[36] P-coh 58 11 (19%) 90 d Y [IL-10] is significantly higher in non-survivors at 72 h post injury
Gouel-Chéron et al[53] P-cc 100 5 (5%) 14 d Y [IL-10] is significantly higher in non-survivors when detectable on days 1 + 2
Heizmann et al[52] R-cc 195 37 (19%) 42 d N [IL-10] tends towards lower levels in non-survivors; not significant
Maier et al[27] P-coh 251 29 (12%) In-hospital AUC ROC 0.51 N [IL-10] is not predictive for non-survival
Neidhardt et al[54] P-cc 417 92 (22%) 21 d Y [IL-10] is significantly increased in non-survivors on days 1 + 3
Sherry et al[14] R-cc 66 1 (2%) 50 d N [IL-10] is not related to non-survival
Sousa et al[51] P-coh 99 28 (28%) 72 h > 8.24 pg/mL: AUC ROC 0.871 (95%CI: 0.715-1.000) Y [IL-10] > 8.24 pg/mL is associated with non-survival at 48 + 72 h post injury
TNF-αα
Dresing et al[26] P-coh 30 6 (19%) 29 d N [TNF-α] is not significantly elevated in non-survivors
Sousa et al[51] P-coh 99 28 (28%) 72 h N [TNF-α] is not significantly elevated in non-survivors
Spielmann et al[57] P-cc 47 11 (23%) 6 d N [TNF-α] is not significantly elevated in non-survivors
Svoboda et al[62] P-cc 42 11 (26%) In-hospital Y [TNF-α] is significantly elevated in non-survivors
Yagmur et al[63] P-cc 99 17 (17%) 60 d N [TNF-α] is not significantly elevated in non-survivors
IL-18
Heizmann et al[52] R-cc 195 37 (19%) 42 d N [IL-18] tends towards lower levels in non-survivors; not significant
Mommsen et al[30] P-coh 55 7 (13%) 14 d Y [IL-18] is significantly increased in non-survivors on days 2-7
Roetman et al[60] P-cc 229 36 (16%) 30 d N [IL-18] median value is significantly lower in non-survivors
IL-2
Heizmann et al[52] R-cc 195 37 (19%) 42 d N [IL-2] tends towards lower levels in non-survivors; not significant
Svoboda et al[62] P-cc 42 11 (26%) In-hospital N [IL-2] is not related to non-survival
Yagmur et al[63] P-cc 99 17 (17%) 60 d Y [IL-2] is significantly increased in non-survivors
IL-1
Svoboda et al[62] P-cc 42 11 (26%) In-hospital N [IL-1] is not related to non-survival
Yagmur et al[63] P-cc 99 17 (17%) 60 d N [IL-1] is not related to non-survival
IL-12
Heizmann et al[52] R-cc 195 37 (19%) 42 d N [IL-12] tends towards lower levels in non-survivors; not significant
Wick et al[49] P-coh 37 6 (16%) In-hospital Y [IL-12] is significantly lower in non-survivors
IL-11
Schinkel et al[61] P-cc 216 34 (16%) In-hospital N [IL-11] is lower in non-survivors, only reaching significance after week 4
Heizmann et al[52] R-cc 195 37 (19%) 42 d N [IL-11] tends towards lower levels in non-survivors; not significant
IL-17
Frangen et al[59] P-cc 71 16 (22%) In-hospital N [IL-17] is not related to non-survival
IL-4
Heizmann et al[52] R-cc 195 37 (19%) 42 d N [IL-4] tends towards lower levels in non-survivors; not significant
Roetman et al[60] P-cc 229 36 (16%) 30 d N [IL-4] is not related to mortality
IFN-γ
Heizmann et al[52] R-cc 195 37 (19%) 42 d N [IFN-γ] tends towards lower levels in non-survivors; not significant
Roetman et al[60] P-cc 229 36 (16%) 30 d N [IFN-γ] inconsistently detectable

P-coh: Prospective cohort study; P-cc: Prospective case-control study; R-cc: Retrospective case-control study; IL: Interleukin; TNF: Tumor necrosis factor; IFN: Interferon; AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; Pts: Patients; Y: Yes; N: No.