Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 27;22(3):253–258. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv330

Table 4:

Rate of PPM implantation after sutureless aortic valve replacement with the Perceval bioprosthesis in different centres

Article Centre No. of patients PPM (%) Special features
van Boxtel et al. [3] Eindhoven, Netherlands 31 13.3 19.4% concomitant CABG
Meuris et al. [18] Pilot trial 30 3.3 5-year follow-up
Miceli et al. [19] Massa, Italy–Nuremberg, Germany 281 4.2 Minimally invasive
Mazine et al. [20] Canadian multicentre study 215 17 6 Canadian centres
Laborde et al. [21] Cavalier Trial 658 11.6 25 European centres
Rubino et al. [22] European multicentre study 314 8 5 European centres
König et al. [23] Jena, Germany 14 28.6 Comparison with a stented model
Flameng et al. [1] Leuven, Belgium 32 3.1 Conventional approach

CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; PPM: permanent pacemaker.