Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 7;23(1):57–64. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw089

Table 4:

Recent studies regarding RFA for the treatment of lung metastases

First author, year Pts Mts Median diameter (cm), range Histology 90-day mortality Morbidity Median follow-up (months), range 1-y OS 3-y OS 5-y OS
Gillams, 2013 122 398 1.7a (0.5–4) Colon 1/122 15% pnx drained
3.9% major complications
12 (6–102) NR 57%b NR
Chua, 2010 188 148 4a (SD ± 1) Various 0 30% pnx drained (1 pt operated for lung abscess)
11% pleural effusion
29 (2–103) NR 60% 45%
Yan, 2006 55 70c 2.1a (SD ± 1.1) Colon 0 16% pnx drained
7% pleural effusion
24 (6–40) 85% 46% NR
Petre, 2013 45 69 NR (0.4–3.5) Colon 0 19% pnx drained
4% pleural effusion
18 (7–43) 95% 50% NR
de Baère, 2015 566 642 1.5 (0.4–7) Various 2/566 58% pnx drained 35 (20–53)d 92% 68% 52%
Present report 61 86 2 (0.7–5) Various 1/61 7.7% pnx drained (1 pt operated for prolonged air leak)
2% pleural effusion
28 (2–126) 95% 49% 45%

Pts: number of treated patients; Mts: number of treated metastases; 1-y OS: 1-year overall survival; 3-y OS: 3-year overall survival; 5-y OS: 5-year overall survival; NR: not reported; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; SD: standard deviation.

aMean.

bCalculated from the first RFA treatment.

cTotal RFA.

dInterquartile.