Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 16;11(8):e0160970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160970

Table 3. Pathway enrichment of differentially expressed genes upon measles virus stimulation using independent annotation sources.

Effect of Viral Stimulation (in all subjects) Interaction (high vs. low Ab responders)
Sourcea Term Mb Nc p-value q-value Nc p-value q-value
GOA Extracellular Space 685 49 1.9E-15 2.9E-11 23 7.1E-10 6.0E-06
GOA Cytokine Activity 92 12 2.1E-07 2.2E-04 8 3.6E-07 1.9E-03
GOA Chemokine Mediated Signaling 51 15 2.5E-14 2.0E-10 6 1.8E-06 4.9E-03
GOA Inflammatory Response 263 27 1.5E-12 4.1E-09 12 5.0E-07 2.0E-03
MSigDB NABA Matrisome 539 58 3.8E-27 1.7E-23 28 1.3E-16 1.2E-12
MSigDB Hallmark of Inflammatory Response 181 29 1.3E-18 2.9E-15 16 2.7E-13 6.6E-10
KEGG CP Cytokine Cytokine-Receptor Interaction 187 28 3.3E-17 4.6E-15 10 1.1E-06 1.5E-04
KEGG CP Chemokine Signaling 164 16 1.3E-07 8.6E-06 5 7.1E-03 2.4E-01
KEGG CP Focal Adhesion 161 9 4.2E-03 8.3E-02 6 1.2E-03 8.1E-02

aThe annotation source: GOA, human Gene Ontology Annotation; MSigDB genesets, excluding those derived from GO terms, genomic proximity, and cancer; KEGG CP, our filtered subset of canonical pathways (see Methods).

bThe total number of genes that are annotated with the given term.

cThe number of genes from our analysis and passing statistical significance thresholds (see Methods) that are annotated with the given term.