Table 6.
Model | Estimate | SE | Est/SE | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | ||||
T1 parent phrase omissions → T2 parent phrase omissions | 0.14 | 0.13 | 1.09 | .28 |
T1 child NDW → T2 child NDW | 0.49 | 0.10 | 4.94 | < .001** |
T1 parent phrase omissions → T1 child NDW | −0.27 | 0.13 | −2.19 | .03* |
T2 parent phrase omissions → T2 child NDW | −0.24 | 0.11 | −2.31 | .02* |
T1 parent phrase omissions → T2 child NDW | −0.21 | 0.11 | −2.03 | .04* |
Model 2 | ||||
T1 parent phrase omissions → T2 parent phrase omissions | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.11 | .91 |
T1 child NDW → T2 child NDW | 0.58 | 0.09 | 6.46 | < .001** |
T1 child NDW → T1 parent phrase omissions | −0.27 | 0.13 | −2.19 | .03* |
T2 child NDW → T2 parent phrase omissions | −0.37 | 0.15 | −2.44 | .02* |
T1 child NDW → T2 parent phrase omissions | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.28 | .78 |
Note. Parent determiner omissions were calculated by dividing the total number of noun phrases with an omitted obligatory determiner by the total number of utterances that parents produced. T1 = Time 1; T2 = Time 2; NDW = mean number of different word roots per minute. Results are presented for the group of n = 55 children.
p < .05.
p < .01.