Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tob Control. 2016 Feb 16;26(2):210–216. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052671

Table 2.

Participants characteristics by intervention group among participants in the final survey in the 9 intervention and 8 control worksites

Intervention among participants in follow-up survey (N=3117) Control among participants in follow-up survey (N=2976) P value*
Age 37.4 (± 11.09) 36.9 (± 10.13) 0.92
Gender 0.70
 Male 2971 (95.3%) 2765 (92.9%)
 Female 146 (4.7%) 211 (7.1%)
Worker status 0.65
 Production workers 2348 (79.7%) 2312 (79.3%)
 Non Production workers 597 (20.3%) 602 (20.7%)
Tenure at worksite 0.97
 Less than 1 year 317 (10.2%) 348 (11.7%)
 1 year or more than 1 year 2788 (89.8%) 2623 (88.3%)
Economic wellbeing 0.651
 Both refrigerator and vehicle 1566 (50.6%) 1188 (40.3%)
 Either refrigerator or vehicle 759 (24.5%) 892 (30.3%)
 None 767 (24.8%) 867 (29.4%)
Education 0.392
 None – 6th standard 251 (8.1%) 251 (8.4%)
 7th – 10th standard 1013 (32.5%) 1090 (36.7%)
 12th standard or diploma 914 (29.4%) 925 (31.1%)
 graduation + 935 (30.0%) 705 (23.7%)
Marital status 0.47
 Currently married 2379 (76.4%) 2385 (80.3%)
 Currently not married 733 (23.6%) 585 (19.7%)
*

Adjusted for the clustering of workers in worksites.

1

Comparing none vs. all others

2

Comparing graduation + vs. all others