Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 9;39(5):705–712. doi: 10.1007/s10545-016-9948-7

Table 6.

Interrater reliability of items on the International Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (IPMDS)

Factor Basic functioning ICCagreement No. = number of patients Feasibility
1.01 Response to environment 0.670 17
1.02 Exercise capacity 0.701 13 x
1.03 Walking distance 0.847 16
1.04 Tiredness 0.780 16
1.05 Depressed 0.847 12 x
1.06 Epilepsy 0.855 17
1.07 Headache 0.931 12 x
1.08 Muscle pain 0.575 12 x
1.09 Infections 0.581 17
1.10 Chewing 0.942 17
1.11 Swallowing 0.886 17
1.12 Hearing 0.762 17
1.13 Communicating 0.953 16
1.14 Vomiting 0.972 17
1.15 Gastroesophageal reflux 0.962 15
1.16 Constipation 0.833 17
1.17 Diarrhoea 0.976 16
1.18 Cognitive functioning 0.635 15
1.19 Behavioural problems 0.443 16
1.20 Autistic features 0.661 11 x
1.21 Breathing subjective 0.934 15
1.22a Continence day 0.725 14
1.22b Continence night 0.725 14
1.23a Strabismus when tired 0.736 15
1.23b Ptosis when tired 0.573 15
1.23c Dysarthria when tired 0.838 13 x
2.01 Growth 0.944 15
2.02 Weight 0.751 15
2.03 Alertness NV 17
2.04 Breathing 0.740 17
2.05 Dysarthria 0.901 12 x
2.06 Ptosis 0.553 17
2.07 Strabismus 0.82 16
2.08 Eye movements 0.691 16
2.09 Nystagmus 0.925 16
2.10 Vision 0.343 11 x
2.11 Proximal muscle power 0.913 15
2.12 Distal muscle power 0.738 14
2.13 Hypokinesia 0.306 14
2.14 Abnormal movements 0.884 16
2.15 Ataxia 0.858 14
2.16 Tremor 0.864 15
2.17 Reflexes 0.312 16
2.18 Hypertonia 0.649 17
2.19 Hypotonia 0.470 17
2.20 Rigitidy 0.597 17
2.21a Vibration 0.231 11 x
2.21b Subtle touch NV 11 x
3.01 Communicating 0.957 17
3.02 Head control 0.983 17
3.03 Rolling over 0.985 16
3.04 Sitting up 0.963 17
3.05 Sitting up 0.984 17
3.06 Standing up 0.979 17
3.07 Standing 0.974 17
3.08 Walking 0.989 17
3.09 Running 0.968 13 Only >6 years
3.10 Hopping 0.954 13 Only >6 years
3.11 Reaching 0.964 16
3.12 Grasping 0.949 16
3.13 Rotating 0.985 14 Only >6 years

ICC agreement median intraclass correlation coefficient for agreement between raters per IPMDS item: ≥ 0.7 good agreement are in bold; ≤0.3 poor agreement is in italic x feasible in <80 % of participants, NV no variance