Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 10;7:12279. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12279

Figure 2. Comparison of enhanced and conventional correlation measurements.

Figure 2

(a,b) Stacks of correlation measurements for full ((a) η=1) and no entanglement ((b) η=0) between sensor and memory qubit for various sensing times Inline graphic as stacking parameter. Associated measurement sequences are given in Fig. 1c. The memory readout signal (that is, the probability of detecting state Inline graphic) is plotted against the correlation time Tc (stack-offset n·0.4, n∈{0, 1, … 10}). Oscillations on the signal are introduced artificially by a phase offset Inline graphic, fT=1 kHz (a) and fT=0.5 kHz (b) to sample the stored quantum phase (see equations 6 and 7). All data sets are fit by Inline graphic. (c) Fit values for decay constant TT over Inline graphic for no (squares, orange) and full (circles, purple) entanglement of sensor and memory. The function Inline graphic is fit to the weighted data and the corresponding parameters are displayed. (d) Signal contrast A0 for Tc=0 over entanglement between sensor and memory qubit (given as negativity Inline graphic, see the ‘Methods' section). All error bars give standard errors taken from the used least square fit.