Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 29;44(Web Server issue):W502–W506. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw360

Table 1. Comparison of Galaxy7TM with AutoDock Vina applied to input GPCR structures (Input-Vina) and to GPCR structures refined by MPrelax (MPrelax-Vina), respectively, in terms of docking accuracy and comparison with GalaxyRefine and MPrelax in terms of improvement in receptor structure quality for full structure (and for binding pocket residues in parentheses) on a test set of 125 GPCR structure-ligand inputs.

Percentage of successful cases for the best of 10 predictions
Docking accuracy Galaxy7TM Input-Vina MPrelax-Vina
Ligand RMSD (≤2.0Å) 20.8 16.0 6.4
Contact ratio (≥30.0%) 24.8 15.2 12.0
Improvement in receptor structure quality Galaxy7TM GalaxyRefine MPrelax
ΔGDT-HA (>0.0) 78.4 (68.0) 77.6 (55.2) 46.4 (52.8)
ΔGDC-SC (>0.0) 93.6 (88.8) 84.0 (52.8) 84.8 (80.0)
ΔCα-RMSD (<0.0) 74.4 (75.2) 71.2 (64.8) 62.4 (60.8)