Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;113(23):6454–6459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521897113

Table S1.

Binary and linear (effect size difference) regression results: key study characteristics (and contextual variability) predicting reproducibility indicators

Characteristic Subjective replication (“Did it replicate?”) Original effect size within 95% CI of replication Meta-analytic estimate Effect size difference Replication P < 0.05 and in the same direction
Contextual sensitivity −0.80 (0.33)* −0.67 (0.25)* −0.03 (0.19) 0.02 (0.02) −0.62 (0.31)*
Original study effect size 1.69 (1.74) 0.15 (1.42) 1.11 (0.12)* 0.47 (0.14)* 1.23 (1.67)
Surprisingness of original finding 0.67 (0.38) −0.12 (0.28) −0.11 (0.22) <0.01 (0.03) −0.48 (0.37)
Power of replication study 11.63 (3.83)* −4.76 (3.04) 0.65 (0.23) −0.31 (0.30) 17.47 (5.43)*
Surprisingness of replication result§ −2.26 (0.58)* −0.85 (0.26)* −0.45 (0.20)* 0.09 (0.02)* −1.80 (0.47)*
*

P < 0.05. Bs are reported with SE in parentheses. All continuous predictors were grand-mean centered.

Coded by authors of this study.

Coded by Reproducibility Project coordinators.

§

Coded by replication team.