Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;113(23):6454–6459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521897113

Table S2.

Binary and linear regression results: all study characteristics (and contextual variability) predicting reproducibility indicators

Characteristic Subjective replication (“Did it replicate?”) Original effect size within 95% CI of replication Meta-analytic estimate Effect size difference Replication P < 0.05 and in the same direction
Contextual sensitivity −0.75 (0.33)* −0.67 (0.26)* −0.03 (0.18) 0.02 (0.02) −0.65 (0.32)*
Original study effect size 2.02 (1.79) −2.00 (1.71) 1.31 (0.13)* 0.48 (0.15)* 2.56 (1.91)
Surprisingness of original finding −0.71 (0.38) −0.13 (0.29) −0.01 (0.21) <0.01 (0.03) −0.56 (0.38)
Power of replication study 11.38 (4.60)* −3.29 (3.13) −0.15 (0.23) −0.30 (0.31) 16.58 (5.85)*
Surprisingness of replication result§ −2.23 (0.58)* −0.90 (0.27)* −0.05 (0.19)* 0.09 (0.03)* −1.92 (0.51)*
Number in original study <0.01 (<0.01) <0.01 (<0.01) 0.01 (<0.01)* <0.01 (<0.01) 0.01 (<0.01)
Similarity of replication to original study§ 0.30 (0.29) −0.13 (0.24) 0.32 (0.02) −0.03 (0.03) 0.41 (0.31)
*

P < 0.05. Bs are reported with SE in parentheses. All continuous predictors were grand-mean centered.

Coded by authors of this study.

Coded by Reproducibility Project coordinators.

§

Coded by replication team.