Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 1;139:376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.053

Table 2.

First row shows the mean and standard deviation of the whole brain PBVC. Below, a comparison between methods is done, the difference in mean with the 95% CI and paired t-test is shown.

N = 41 FSL LEAP NLMI Prop. non-Longitudinal Prop. Longitudinal
Mean (Std.) 0.956 (0.540) 0.910 (0.514) 0.928 (0.540) 0.921 (0.509) 0.934 (0.512)




Difference in mean (95% CI), p-value
FSL vs LEAP 0.045 (-0.002 to 0.093), p = 0.06
FSL vs NLMI 0.028 (-0.015 to 0.071), p = 0.19
FSL vs Prop. non-Longitudinal 0.035 (0.005 to 0.065), p = 0.06
LEAP vs NLMI -0.017 (-0.059 to 0.025), p = 0.42
LEAP vs Prop. non-Longitudinal -0.010 (-0.053 to 0.032), p = 0.62
NLMI vs Prop. non-Longitudinal 0.007 (-0.044 to 0.031), p = 0.72
FSL vs Prop. Longitudinal 0.021 (-0.049 to 0.092), p = 0.54
LEAP vs Prop. Longitudinal -0.024 (-0.073 to 0.025), p = 0.33
NMLI vs Prop. Longitudinal -0.007 (-0.070 to 0.056), p = 0.82
P. non-Longitudinal vs Prop. Longitudinal -0.013 (-0.081 to 0.054), p = 0.69