Table 3. Characteristics of treated lesions and corresponding histology.
| 0-Is(n = 33) | 0-IIa/0-Is(n = 86) | 0-Iia(n = 58) | 0-IIa/0-Iic(n = 5) | LST-G(n = 103) | LST-NG(n = 46) | |
| Size. mean ± SD | 30.4 mm(± 7.6) | 48.7 mm(± 19.4) | 35.9 mm(± 13.6) | 40.0 mm(± 12.7) | 44.0 mm(± 18.9) | 33.8 mm(± 11.5) |
| Localization rectum | 16 (48 %) | 38 (44 %) | 6 (10 %) | 3 (60 %) | 43 (42 %) | 4 (9 %) |
| Histology | ||||||
| SSA | 0 (0 %) | 1 (1 %) | 19 (33 %) | 0 (0 %) | 1 (1 %) | 19 (41 %) |
| LG-IEN | 23 (70 %) | 54 (63 %) | 24 (41 % | 0 (0 %) | 64 (62 %) | 14 (30 %) |
| HG-IEN | 5 (15 %) | 28 (33 %) | 11 (19 %) | 4 (80 %) | 34 (33 %) | 9 (20 %) |
| Carcinoma | 5 (15 %) | 3 (3 %) | 4 (7 %) | 1 (20 %) | 4 (4 %) | 4 (9 %) |
Paris 0-Is lesions were not classified as LST; size is given as mean ± standard deviation.LST-G, laterally spreading tumor granular type; LST-NG, laterally spreading tumor non-granular type; SSA, sessile serrated adenoma; LG-IEN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; HG-IEN, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.