Table 1.

Table represents the preservation statistics of modules from reference (R. serpentina) and test (C. roseus) networks.

S. No.	Modules	Module size	Zsummary score	Correlation of kME values (All-module genes)	Correlation of kME values (in-module genes)
1	Turquoise	200	6.6945826	[0.36, 1.2e–27]	[0.4, 5e–13]
2	Gold	50	2.8849298	–	–
3	Black	51	1.7958002	[0.18, 1.1e–07]	[0.11, 0.44]
4	Gray	83	1.4699666	[0.23, 9.2e–12]	[−0.29, 0.0078]
5	Brown	88	0.8751528	[0.28, 6.4e–17]	[−0.13, 0.23]
6	Yellow	73	0.6934353	[0.28, 6.4e–17]	[−0.079, 0.51]
7	Green	67	0.5611602	[0.24, 1e–12]	[0.24, 0.05]
8	Red	61	0.5386991	[0.34, 1.2e–24]	[−0.11, 0.4]
9	Blue	133	−0.9531561	[−0.016, 0.64]	[−0.029, 0.74]

Module membership (kME) of the genes from each module were compared and computed for their correlation. Modules which are having a high correlation with significant p-value are highly preserved. Where, all- and in-module genes include the correlation of all genes in module and subset of genes, respectively, to display hub-gene conservation.