Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 8;116:259–269. doi: 10.1007/s13760-016-0662-x

Table 4.

Comparison between 3 and 7 T MRI’s combining all characteristic on T2 and FLAIR

Patient 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 11 7 T better:3 T better
Blurring T2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8/8:0/8
Focal thickening T2 Na 0 1 1 Na 1 1 0 4/6:0/6 (na:2)
Focal increased intensity T2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 −1 4/8:1/8
Transmantle sign T2 Na 0 Na Na Na 0 1 1 2/4:0/4 (na:4)
Transition to normal cortex T2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 7/8:0/8
Gyral pattern T2 Na Na 1 1 Na Na Na Na 2/2 (na:6)
Internal structure T2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8/8:0/8
Blurring FLAIR −1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/8:1/8
Focal thickening FLAIR Na 0 1 1 Na 1 0 0 3/6:0/6 (na:2)
Focal increased intensity FLAIR −1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 5/8:1/8
Transmantle sign FLAIR Na 1 Na Na 0 0 1 1 3/5:0/5 (na:3)
Transition to normal cortex FLAIR −1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W 7 T, G 3 T (1) 6a/8:1a/8
Gyral pattern FLAIR Na Na 1 1 Na Na Na Na 2/2:0/2 (na:6)
Internal structure FLAIR Na Na 1 1 1 1 1 1 6/6:0/6 (na:2)
Total 7 T better than 3 T 4/7 5/11 12/12 12/12 8/9 9/12 10/12 6/11a
Total 3 T better than 7 T 3/7 0/11 0/12 0/12 0/9 0/12 0/12 1/11a
Total not applicable 7 3 2 2 5 2 2 2a

−1 3 T better than 7 T, 0 equally visible on 3 T and 7 T, 1 7 T better than 3 T, Na Not applicable as not visible on either 7 T or 3 T, W white matter, G gray matter

aExcluding patient 11 transition to normal cortex on FLAIR