Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 4;2016:3898750. doi: 10.1155/2016/3898750

Table 4.

Difference in number of annotated IRFs between Grader 1 and Grader 2 in the training set scans 1 to 4 for each vendor.

Set Spectralis Cirrus Topcon Nidek Mean diff. ± SD (IRFs)
Training 1 1 7 48 24 20 ± 21.06
Training 2 3 8 106 95 53 ± 55.07
Training 3 21 67 46 153 71.75 ± 57.34
Training 4 8 9 33 n/a 16.67 ± 14.15

Mean diff. ± SD (IRFs) 8.25 ± 8.99 22.75 ± 29.51 58.25 ± 32.52 90.67 ± 64.61