Table 1.
Performance of RES-Scanner compared with other methods applied to GM12878 human lymphoblastoid cell line data
All | Alu | Repetitive non-Alu | Nonrepetitive | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | % A-to-I | Total | % A-to-I | Total | % A-to-I | Total | % A-to-I | |
Ramaswami et al. [22] | 150,865 | 95.7 | 147,029 | 95.8 | 2,385 | 97.4 | 1,451 | 86.6 |
REDItools [30] | 222,288 | 91.3 | 221,401 | 91.2 | Not investigated | 887 | 92.2 | |
GIREMI [24] | 37,591 | 98.6 | 36,131 | 99.0 | 267 | 83.7 | 1,193 | 82.8 |
RES-Scanner (pre-aligned) | 151,952 | 96.3 | 147,542 | 96.4 | 3,247 | 97.0 | 1,163 | 87.5 |
RES-Scanner (raw reads) | 153,848 | 95.8 | 149,710 | 95.9 | 2,794 | 97.8 | 1,344 | 81.3 |