Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Oct 26;63(7):1426–1439. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2494838

TABLE IV.

Segmentation performance — sequences not successfully segmented automatically. For each sequence, the first row gives automatic-method results (labeled “auto”). The second row presents results using the semi-automatic key-frame-based method; numbers in the “Key Frame” column denote the frame(s) Il interactively selected as a key frame(s) for restarting the segmentation method. The last four rows give aggregate results over the 5 sequences.

Case No. N Time Key Frame Dice FDR
F 2 233 26.8 auto 83.5±9.1 11.1±14.5
54.7 207 89.6±6.0 4.8±8.2
I 2 49 4.9 auto 81.0±6.7 12.1±9.7
10.9 14 81.7±6.0 9.7±3.3
4 75 6.0 auto 76.9±6.6 4.0±3.8
15.5 68 77.3±9.4 3.6±3.2
L 1 53 6.3 auto 80.7±15.9 17.0±24.5
13.4 35 88.9±5.4 0.8±1.8
2 38 4.1 auto 62.2±17.7 27.0±19.0
8.7 9, 26 85.0±4.9 3.1±3.3

automatic 76.8±7.6
[62.2, 83.5]
14.2±7.6
[4.0, 27.0]

semi-automatic 84.5±4.6
[77.3, 89.6]
4.4±2.9
[0.8, 9.7]