Table 1. Description of categories of the Eindhoven Classification Model: PRISMA-medical Version [17, 18].
Main category | Subcategory | Code | Description | Examples (if available) * |
---|---|---|---|---|
Technical | External | T-ex | Technical failures beyond the control of the organisation. | Not available |
Design | TD | Failures to poor design of equipment etc. | Not available | |
Construction | TC | Correct design inappropriately constructed or placed. | Not available | |
Materials | TM | Material defects not classified under TD or TC. | Not available | |
Organisational | External | O-ex | Failures at an organisational level beyond the control and responsibility of the investigating team. | Not available |
Transfer of knowledge | OK | Failure resulting from inadequate measures to train or supervise new or inexperienced staff. | Not available | |
Protocols | OP | Failures relating to the quality or availability of appropriate protocols. | • Not following pain treatment protocol after surgery | |
Management priorities | OM | Internal management decisions which reduce focus on patient safety when faced with conflicting priorities. | • No beds available at ICU | |
Culture | OC | Failure due to attitude and approach of the treating organisation. | • Ward where vital parameters are not frequently taken since ‘no one does it’ | |
Human | External | H-ex | Human failures beyond the control of the organisation/department | • Intoxication of too high dosage medication prescribed outside hospital care (by GP) |
Knowledge-based behavior | HKK | Failure of an individual to apply their knowledge to a new clinical situation | • No adequate diagnostics • No physical examination done |
|
Qualifications | HRQ | An inappropriately trained individual performing the clinical task | Not available | |
Co-ordination | HRC | A lack of task co-ordination within the healthcare team | • No coordination of hypertension treatment | |
Verification | HRV | Failure to correctly check and assess the situation before performing interventions | • DNR policy not adequately discussed | |
Intervention | HRI | Failure resulting from faulty task planning or performance | • No diagnostics and adequate treatment delirium | |
Monitoring | HRM | Failure to monitor the patient’s progress or condition | • No evaluation of vitals after changing treatment • Vitals not monitored and action undertaken after reported deterioration |
|
Skills-based | HSS | Failure in performance of highly developed skills | • Obstructive lesion trachea not recognised/missed by radiologist on CT | |
Patient | Patient-related | PRF | Failures related to patient characteristics or conditions, which are beyond the control of staff and influence clinical progress | • Monitoring not adequate because patient refused CAD |
Disease-related | DRF | Failures related to the natural progress of disease which are beyond control of patient, its carers and staff | • Tumor progression in vena cava inferior • Biliary pancreatitis |
|
X | Unclassifiable | X | • Medication was still being dosed properly • Toxic reaction chemotherapy |
*A table with overview of all root causes is provided in S1 Table.