Table 2.
Structure quality indicators for β-galactosidase structures. β-galactosidase structures investigated in the present study were uploaded to the MolProbity server (http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu) to extract the quantities presented below. The results show that the cMDFF- and ReMDFF-refined structures not only exhibit good measures of fit, but also improve the clash score and rotamer geometries, relative to the de novo and initial structures, while incurring only a small expense in Ramachandran statistics, bad angles, and Cβ deviations.
| de novo (Bartesaghi et al., 2014) | Refined de novo | Initial | Direct MDFF | cMDFF | ReMDFF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clashscore | 53.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Poor rotamers (%) | 11.6 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 1.37 |
| Favored rotamers (%) | 67.4 | 90.8 | 87.8 | 92.1 | 89.8 | 95.3 |
| Ramachandran outliers (%) | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| Ramachandran favored (%) | 97.4 | 95.8 | 91.1 | 91.1 | 94.4 | 90.9 |
| MolProbity | 3.14 | 1.23 | 1.49 | 1.38 | 1.37 | 1.13 |
| C deviations (%) | 0.0 | 0.05 | 4.92 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.39 |
| Bad bonds (%) | 0.09 | 0.04 | 3.61 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Bad angles (%) | 0.03 | 0.60 | 3.98 | 0.63 | 0.49 | 0.37 |
| RMS distance (Å) | 0.007 (0.025%) | 0.019 (0%) | 0.035 (0.237%) | 0.022 (0%) | 0.019 (0%) | 0.021 (0%) |
| RMS angle (degrees) | 1.1 (0.009%) | 2.2 (0.009%) | 3.6 (1.177%) | 2.4 (0.103%) | 2.1 (0.018%) | 2.3 (0.085%) |
| Cis prolines (%) | 8.06 | 8.06 | 6.45 | 6.45 | 6.45 | 8.06 |
| Cis non-prolines (%) | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.15 | 0.0 |