Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2016 Jul 28;91(4):863–877. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.013

Figure 4. Electrophysiological responses of md-L neurons to mechanical stimuli.

Figure 4

(A) Bending of L-type taste bristles exerted compression forces underneath dendritic arbors of md-L neurons, thereby leading to the firing of action potentials in md-L neurons. L4 taste bristles from the indicated flies were deflected 20 μm in the dorsal, ventral, anterior and posterior directions. The rescue flies were tmc-Gal4/UAS-tmc;tmc1. The vertical arrows indicate the onset of the mechanical stimuli.

(B) Box and whisker plots showing the number of spikes/500 ms. n=10.

(C—E) Tip recording traces showing the responses of control and tmc1 GRNs to chemical stimulation. The box and whisker plots show the summary tip recording data. Not significant, n.s. n=5.

(C) 50 mM NaCl (L4 sensilla).

(D) 50 mM sucrose (L4 sensilla).

(E) 10 mM caffeine (S6 sensilla).

The error bars indicate SEMs. *p< 0.05. ANOVA tests with Scheffé’s post-hoc analysis.