Table 11.
Comparison of various parameters found for symmetric periodic silicon grating line structure found using experimental data. CMAES with Ξ was used. The parameters presented are the best fit values (corresponding to the lowest goodness of fit values). For the cases of M = 1,2,4, and 5 only the total height HTot and full width at half max height WFWHM were compared since the individual trapezoid components making up the structure in those cases are not comparable (NC).
Parameter | M = 1 | M = 2 | M = 3 | M = 4 | M = 5 | Previous Study M = 3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTot [nm] | 25.66 | 26.65 | 26.55 | 26.97 | 26.73 | 26.24 |
H1 [nm] | NC | NC | 7.80 | NC | NC | 5.74 |
H2 [nm] | NC | NC | 16.15 | NC | NC | 17.57 |
H3 [nm] | NC | NC | 2.59 | NC | NC | 2.93 |
WFWHM [nm] | 13.55 | 13.85 | 13.87 | 13.92 | 13.97 | 14.19 |
W1 [nm] | NC | NC | 21.36 | NC | NC | 21.83 |
W2 [nm] | NC | NC | 14.67 | NC | NC | 15.13 |
W3 [nm] | NC | NC | 12.30 | NC | NC | 12.89 |
W4 [nm] | NC | NC | 1.84 | NC | NC | 1.92 |
DW [nm] | 1.51 | 1.29 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.25 | 1.26 |
IExp | −2.33 | −2.34 | −2.36 | −2.36 | −2.33 | −2.22 |
IBk | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.49 |
Ξ | 0.236 | 0.199 | 0.186 | 0.185 | 0.187 | 0.195 |