Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 18;16:403. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1650-9

Table 1.

Methodological quality of included studies assessed by the EPOC risk of bias criteria

Study Design Allocation sequence Allocation concealment Baseline outcome Baseline characteristics Incomplete outcomes Blinding Contamination Selective reporting Other bias
Anderson, 2005 [29] NRCT H H U H U L H L U
Dai, 2003 [37] CBA H H U H L U H L H
Jaarsma, 1999 [32] NRCT U U L L U L H L L
McDonald, 2001 [33] NRCT U U U L L L H L L
Naylor, 1994 [36] NRCT U U U H U L H L L
Record, 2011 [34] NRCT H U L H U L U L L
Riegel, 2006 [31] NRCT U L U U L L H L L
Sales, 2014 [35] NRCT U U U L L L H L L
Sorknaes, 2011 [30] NRCT H H U L L L H L L
Sorknaes, 2013 [28] RCT L L L L L L H L L

Studies coded as high risk are labelled with “H”, those coded as low risk are labelled with an “L” and those studies coded as unclear (which did not provide sufficient information to assess risk of bias) are labelled with “U”