Table 3.
Adjusted odds ratio and 95 % confidence interval for good management (Reference: no care outside the home) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Facility Care | Community Care | Traditional Care | |
Burkina Faso | 12.0 (8.0, 18.2)* | 5.7 (4.0, 8.2)* | 0.7 (0.3, 1.8) |
Burundi | 11.2 (8.3, 15.1)* | 2.2 (0.9, 5.3) | 2.6 (0.9, 7.8) |
Cameroon | 17.0 (10.9, 26.7)* | 8.4 (5.6, 12.6)* | 1.1 (0.7, 1.8) |
Cote d’Ivoire | 9.6 (5.7, 16.3)* | 9.0 (4.1, 19.9)* | 0.7 (0.3, 1.5) |
DR Congo | 6.0 (4.5, 8.0)* | 2.7 (2, 3.8)* | 1.6 (0.8, 3.4) |
Ethiopia | 9.5 (6.1, 14.9)* | 5.9 (3.1, 11.4)* | 1.5 (0.2, 9.9) |
Mali | 10.3 (4.7, 22.6)* | 6.5 (3.9, 10.9)* | 1.6 (0.9, 2.8) |
Niger | 5.2 (2.5, 11.0)* | 13.0 (9.4, 18.2)* | 1.4 (0.8, 2.5) |
Nigeria | 4.4 (3.2, 6.2)* | 3.8 (2.2, 6.5)* | 0.8 (0.4, 1.6)* |
Sierra Leone | 0.9 (0.7, 1.4) | 1.4 (0.9, 2.3) | 0.9 (0.3, 3.1) |
Tanzania | 7.1 (3.7, 13.6)* | 5.1 (3.2, 8.1)* | |
Uganda | 3.3 (2.2, 4.9)* | 6.5 (4.2, 10.1)* | 1.8 (0.7, 4.7) |
*Significantly different from 1 with p < 0.05
*The final model measuring the probability of ‘good’ diarrhea management on source of care was adjusted by the following variables
• predisposing characteristics -child’s age, mother’s age, child’s gender, mother’s marital status and education, number of children under five living in household
• enabling resources- wealth quintile, rural or urban location, if distance is a problem in receiving health care, participating in decision making, household improved water access
• need characteristic -whether there was blood in the child’s stool