Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 19;16:830. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3475-1

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for good diarrhea management for enabling, predisposing, and need related factors per Anderson’s model*

Adjusted odds ratio and 95 % confidence interval for good management (Reference: no care outside the home)
Facility Care Community Care Traditional Care
Burkina Faso 12.0 (8.0, 18.2)* 5.7 (4.0, 8.2)* 0.7 (0.3, 1.8)
Burundi 11.2 (8.3, 15.1)* 2.2 (0.9, 5.3) 2.6 (0.9, 7.8)
Cameroon 17.0 (10.9, 26.7)* 8.4 (5.6, 12.6)* 1.1 (0.7, 1.8)
Cote d’Ivoire 9.6 (5.7, 16.3)* 9.0 (4.1, 19.9)* 0.7 (0.3, 1.5)
DR Congo 6.0 (4.5, 8.0)* 2.7 (2, 3.8)* 1.6 (0.8, 3.4)
Ethiopia 9.5 (6.1, 14.9)* 5.9 (3.1, 11.4)* 1.5 (0.2, 9.9)
Mali 10.3 (4.7, 22.6)* 6.5 (3.9, 10.9)* 1.6 (0.9, 2.8)
Niger 5.2 (2.5, 11.0)* 13.0 (9.4, 18.2)* 1.4 (0.8, 2.5)
Nigeria 4.4 (3.2, 6.2)* 3.8 (2.2, 6.5)* 0.8 (0.4, 1.6)*
Sierra Leone 0.9 (0.7, 1.4) 1.4 (0.9, 2.3) 0.9 (0.3, 3.1)
Tanzania 7.1 (3.7, 13.6)* 5.1 (3.2, 8.1)*
Uganda 3.3 (2.2, 4.9)* 6.5 (4.2, 10.1)* 1.8 (0.7, 4.7)

*Significantly different from 1 with p < 0.05

*The final model measuring the probability of ‘good’ diarrhea management on source of care was adjusted by the following variables

• predisposing characteristics -child’s age, mother’s age, child’s gender, mother’s marital status and education, number of children under five living in household

• enabling resources- wealth quintile, rural or urban location, if distance is a problem in receiving health care, participating in decision making, household improved water access

• need characteristic -whether there was blood in the child’s stool