Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 29;11(4):473–486. doi: 10.1002/biot.201400862

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of microcarriers for hBM‐MSC culture in static microwell plates. For hBM‐MSC1 expansion, the glucose consumption and lactate production (A), WST‐1 absorbance (B) and viable cell number (C) for each microcarrier is given. Glucose consumption and lactate production for hBM‐MSC2 (D) and glucose consumption and lactate production for hBM‐MSC3 (E). The control condition (No MC) contained no microcarriers and no cell attachment was expected as ultra‐low attachment plates were used. Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 8). Significant differences in values were noted with p < 0.05 (*) in comparison to the highest respective value for each assay.