Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 26;7(15):20166–20179. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7737

Table 1. Summary of the statistical tests performed and obtained significances.

Statistical Test
Tumor Type Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test Chi-square
FOLR1 p<0.0001 27.16
FPGS p<0.0001 29.24
GGT1 p=0.0289 9.03
TYMS p<0.0001 23.69
FOLR1/TYMS Ratio p<0.0001 36.44
FOLR1/SLC19A1 Ratio p<0.0001 24.94
FPGS/TYMS Ratio p<0.0001 32.77
FPGS/GGT1 Ratio p=0.1
ERCC1 p=0.0021 14.69
MLH1 p<0.0001 16.61
XRCC1 p=0.0131 10.75
MSH6 p=0.0064 12.29
MLH1/MSH2 Ratio p<0.0010 16.34
Pearson's Chi-squared test X-squared
FOLR1/TYMS Phenotype p<0.0001 47.34
FGPS/TYMS Phenotype p<0.0001 47.32
MLH1/MSH2 Phenotype p=0.0014 27.10
Grade of Differentiation Spearman's rank correlation rho rho
FOLR1 p<0.0001 −0.6421
FPGS p<0.0001 −0.6501
TYMS p<0.0001 0.6329
GGT1 p=0.0366 −0.2825
ERCC1 p<0.007 −0.3599
MLH1 p=0.0046 −0.3766
MSH6 p=0.0210 0.3105
Tumor Stage Spearman's rank correlation rho rho
FOLR1 p=0.0049 −0.4076
ERCC1 p=0.0147 −0.3575
MLH1 p=0.0214 −0.3383
XRCC1 p=0.0226 −0.3357
Spread to Lymph Nodes (N-Stage) Spearman's rank correlation rho rho
FOLR1 p=0.0001 −0.5192
FPGS p=0.0038 −0.4021
MLH1 p=0.0111 −0.3562
Gender Exact Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test Z-value
FOLR1 p=0.0037 2.87
FPGS p=0.0489 1.97
ERCC1 p=0.0408 2.04
MLH1 p=0.0308 2.15
XRCC1 p=0.0246 2.24
Overall Survival (OS) Likelihood ratio test Hazard Ratio
Data for 35 patients (10 events)
FOLR1 p=0.0014 1.00
FPGS p<0.0004 1.00
TYMS p=0.0200 0.99
ERCC1 p=0.0082 1.00
MLH1 p<0.0040 1.00
XRCC1 p=0.0263 1.00
FOLR1/TYMS Ratio p<0.0040 1.03
FOLR1/SLC19A1 Ratio p=0.0017 1.05
FPGS/TYMS Ratio p<0.0001 2.54
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Score (logrank) test Hazard Ratio
Data for 11 patients (8 events)
FOLR1 p=0.0049 0.99
ERCC1 p=0.0026 0.99
FOLR1/SLC19A1 Ratio p=0.0223 0.69
FOLR1/TYMS Ratio p=0.0200 0.26
FPGS/TYMS Ratio p=0.0225 <0.01