Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 4;4:e2307. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2307

Table 4. Summary of analyses, model choice, partitioning, and support for major clades in the resulting topologies.

Analysis Reference Model(s) Partitioned Cervidae Cervinae Cervini Muntiacini Capreolinae Capreolini Odocoileini Blastocerina Odocoileina
BI-mtG Fig. 3A, Fig. S1 GTR Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
BI-1140-unpart Fig. 3B, Fig. 4, Fig. S2 GTR N 1 1 1 1 1 .84 .98 .99
BI-1140-part Fig. 3C, Fig. S3 SYM Y 1 .99 1 1 1 .75 .87
HKY
GTR
ML-1140 Fig. 3D, Fig. S4 GTR N 99 89 99 92 100 57 55 41
BI-747-unpart Fig. 3E, Fig. S5 GTR N 1 1 1 .81 1 .85
BI-747-part Fig. 3F, Fig. S6 SYM Y 1 .99 1 .90 1
HKY
GTR
BI-569-unpart Fig. 3G, Fig. S7 GTR N 1 .99 .92 1

Notes.

Abbreviations:

BI
Bayesian Inference
ML
Maximum Likelihood, the number represents the Cytb sequence length in the current alignment
Y
yes
N
no
part
partitioned
unpart
unpartitioned

The values within cells represent the node support for the respective split either as Bayesian posterior probabilities or as bootstrap support from maximum likelihood analyses; “–” indicates that the clade was not recovered in the respective analysis.