Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 25;129:319–328. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2177-y

Table 2.

Confounders of resectability

Volume epMRI Volume follow-up MRI EOR epMRI EOR follow-up MRI
Spearman rho p value Spearman rho p value Spearman rho p value Spearman rho p value
Continuous variables
 Age 0.162 0.367 0.264 0.087 −0.184 0.314 −0.338 0.031
 Volume preoperative 0.845 <0.0001 0.818 <0.0001 −0.338 0.063 −0.572 <0.001
 dT2T1 preoperative 0.269 0.143 0.159 0.334 −0.008 0.966 −0.057 0.731
Binary variables
 KPS preoperative 0.870 0.683 0.917 0.700
 Incidental finding 0.024 0.001 0.555 0.019
 Tumor eloquence 0.940 0.659 0.917 0.642
 IDH1 mutation 0.314 0.208 0.397 0.577
 iMRI surgery 0.013 0.008 0.0318 0.001

Analysis of confounders of resectability. Association of continuous variables was assessed by spearman correlation analysis, binary variables were analyzed with Mann–Whitney tests. Significant values are presented in bold face

EOR extent of resection, dT2T1 difference in tumor volume expansion on preoperative T2 and T1 sequences, iMRI intraoperative MRI, KPS Karnofsky Performance Scale