Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 14;2016:1205895. doi: 10.1155/2016/1205895

Table 2.

NVG patient backgrounds according to treatment received. The majority of patients in the LEC group had stage 3 NVG and had previously received other treatments, such as adequate PRP, stand-alone anti-VEGF therapy, and PPV. Approximately half (41.2%) of patients that received frequent stand-alone anti-VEGF treatment had previously received repeated anti-VEGF injections.

Treatments Anti-VEGF stand-alone therapy Additional PRP PPV LEC
Number of treatments 17 89 28 32

Anti-VEGF combination therapy (n) 49 15 3

Pre-treatment IOP (mmHg) 36.1 ± 12.5 36.1 ± 13.5 33.7 ± 13.9 35.0 ± 8.1

Criteria
 Rubeosis group 1 (5.9%) 9 (10.1%) 4 (14.3%) 1 (3.1%)
 Open-angle NVG group 10 (58.8%) 51 (57.3%) 12 (42.9%) 8 (25.0%)
 Angle-closure NVG group 6 (35.3%) 12 (32.6%) 12 (42.9%) 23 (71.9%)

Previous treatment
 Anti-VEGF stand-alone therapy 7 (41.2%) 1 (1.1%) 3 (10.7%) 23 (71.9%)
 PRP 17 (100.0%) (44.9%) (85.7%) 32 (100.0%)
 PPV 4 (23.5%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (21.9%)
 LEC 1 (5.9%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (3.1%)

Follow-up  
(pre-treatment, months)
2.5 ± 2.8
0.0 to 8.3
0.8 ± 3.0 
0.0 to 22.3
3.2 ± 7.9
1.0 to 33.3
7.2 ± 11.5
0.0 to 48.8

Follow-up  
(post-treatment, months)
21.0 ± 19.7 
4.1–53.2
25.4 ± 21.6 
4.0–81.8
25.0 ± 14.3 
5.1–56.0
24.5 ± 22.6 
4.3–60.7

PRP, panretinal laser photocoagulation; PPV, pars plana vitrectomy, LEC, trabeculectomy with mitomycin C.

Mean ± SD, Steel-Dwass test P < 0.05 for PDR, P < 0.05 for OIS.