Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genomics. 2016 Feb 21;111(1):10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2016.02.004

Table 3. Top-ranked differentially methylated CpGs in African American patients according to features of more aggressive prostate cancera.

CpG ID Chromosome Gene Gene location Epigenetic location Mean β group 1b Mean β group 2c Mean β difference ≥ 10% Δβ Methylation status FDR q-value ≤ 0.25 Total number of CpGs analyzed within the same gene and epigenetic location, and % that have a similar methylation profile to the top CpGd
Regional vs. local stage
cg11891579 5 EBF1 Body island 0.58 0.41 0.18 hyper 0.03 7 (100%)
cg13295238 5 EBF1 Body island 0.48 0.30 0.17 hyper 0.03 7 (100%)
High vs. low tumor aggressivenesse
cg18845377 7 intergenic island 0.25 0.15 0.10 hyper 0.06

Abbreviations: PCa, prostate cancer; TSS1500, 201 to 1500 base pairs upstream of transcription start site; TSS200, 200 base pairs upstream of transcription start site; UTR, untranslated region

a

Results are from models that adjusted for age at diagnosis and study group and limited to CpGs with an FDR q-value ≤ 0.25 and mean methylation β value difference ≥ 0.10.

b

Patients with regional pathological stage or high tumor aggressiveness

c

Patients with local pathological stage or low tumor aggressiveness

d

The % of CpGs in the same region as the top-ranked CpG that did not meet the criteria for differential methylation (FDR q-value ≤ 0.25 and mean methylation β value difference ≥ 0.10), but that had an increase or decrease in mean methylation level in the same direction as the top CpG for patients with regional vs. local stage.

e

Composite variable of tumor aggressiveness (High = one or more of the following: PCa recurrence or death; Gleason score (7=4+3 or 8-10); and/or regional stage)