Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 22;11(8):e0160972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160972

Table 6. Iterative one-tube-only SDM using large combinations of primers targeting the same residue.

Mutations targeteda Colonies Colonies analyzed Mutations obtainedb
PTEN A126 1st
C2-E2-F3-H2-I2-K3-L2-N2-P1-Q3 R2-T1-W3-Y3 194 14 0-0-0-4-0-1-0-1-0-1 1-2-1-1-2
PTEN A126 2nd
D1-E2-F3-G1-I2-L2-M3-P1-S1-V1 106 10 1-0-1-2-1-1-0-0-2-1-1
PTEN G129 1st
C3-F3-H3-I2-K2-L2-M3-N3-P2-Q2 S1-T2-W2-Y3 24 14 0-0-1-5-0-0-0-0-0-0 0-2-4-0-2
PTEN G129 2nd
A1-D2-E1-F3-K2-L2-M3-N3-P2-Q2 R1-S1-V1-Y3 68 14 2-1-3-0-0-0-1-0-0-2 1-0-2-1-1
PTPRZ-B L1454 1st
A2-C2-D3-E2-F1-G2-H3-I1-K2-M2 N2-P2-Q2-R2-S1-T2-V1-W2-Y2 264 20 1-0-1-0-3-0-2-0-1-0 0-1-3-1-2-1-1-1-1-1
PTPRZ-B L1454 2nd
C2-E2-G2-I1-M2-N2 11 7 0-2-0-3-2-0-0

Data and mutations obtained are represented as in Table 5. pRK5-PTEN or pCDNA3-PTPRZ-B served as template plasmids.

aTwo iterative PCR mutagenic reactions (1st and 2nd) were sequentially run for each targeted residue (A126, G129, and L1454). The mutations targeted in each case are indicated with the amino acid one-letter code, and the superscripts indicate the number of nucleotide mismatches of each mutation with respect to the wild type sequence.

bNumber of samples obtained for each mutation are underlined and indicated following the order of the mutations targeted, and last number (not underlined) corresponds to wild type.