Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2016 Jul 15;63:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.008

Table B.

Logistic Regression Models of Snus Trial and Adoption

Snus Outcomea
Variable Trial
(i.e., Any Use)
Any Frequent Use
(i.e., 6–7 days/week)
Adoption
(i.e., Any Purchase)

OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Age, years (10-year increments) 1.28 (1.06–1.56) **
Male (referent: female) a 2.33 (1.27–4.29) ** 2.58 (1.60–4.17) ** 1.84 (1.07–3.14) *
24-hour smoking quit attempt, past year (referent: no quit attempt) a 1.51 (0.73–3.15)
Motivation to quit smoking (3-unit increments) b 1.18 (0.88–1.60)
Heard of any LNST products (referent: no recognition) a 2.64 (1.20–5.78) *
Use of any LNST products, lifetime (referent: never user) a 1.77 (0.76–4.10)
Perceived personal harm from LNST (3-unit increments) c 0.83 (0.64–1.09) 0.89 (0.69–1.15)
Likelihood of LNST use to reduce smoking (1-unit increment) d 1.78 (1.24–2.55) ** 1.45 (1.06–1.99) * 1.30 (0.88–1.93)
Likelihood of LNST use to quit smoking (1-unit increment) d 0.81 (0.58–1.11) 1.02 (0.77–1.36) 1.13 (0.81–1.57)
Likelihood of LNST use to cope with smoking restrictions (1-unit increment) d 1.08 (0.84–1.39) 1.28 (1.01–1.64) * 1.26 (0.94–1.69)

Note.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

a

0=absence of the behavior/attribute and 1=presence of the behavior/attribute;

b

0 to 10 scale where 0=very definitely no and 10=very definitely yes;

c

0 to 10 scale where 0=not at all harmful and 10=very much harmful;

d

0 to 3 scale where 0=not at all likely and 3=very likely;

OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval