Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Feb 23;5(3):214–223. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00034-6

Table 2.

Contraceptive efficacy of MHC regimens

Regimen N Enrolled Sperm Conc^ (M/mL) N (%)Failed to suppress^^ Median time to enter efficacy (months) N Entered Efficacy Maximum Treatment Duration (months) Pregnancies During Efficacy n (%) Exposure person year Failure rate/100 couple yr
a TE 32 271 0 68 (25) < 6 157 18 1 (0.6) 123.8 0.8 (0.02 – 4.5)
b TU 12 1045 1 43 (5) 3.6 855 30 9 (1.1) 1554.1 1.1 (0.4 – 1.8)
c T implant 34 55 1 2 (4) 1.8 51 18 0 (0.0) 35.5 0 (0.0 – 8.0)
a TE 25 399 3* Not reported* 2.2 349 18 11 (3.1) 279.9 1.4 (0.4 – 3.7)
b TU 33 308 3 9 (3) 2–3 296 12 1 (0.3) 143 2.3 (0.5 – 4.2)
Total (0, 1, 3) 2078 0, 1, 3 122 (7) 1708 12–30 22 (1.3) 2136.3 1.0 (0.7 – 1.6)
Total (0, 1) 1371 0, 1 113 (8) 1063 18–30 10 (0.9) 1713.4 0.6 (0.3 – 1.1)
Total (1) 1100 1 45 (4) 906 18–30 9 (1.0) 1589.6 0.6 (0.3 – 1.1)
^

Sperm concentration required to enter efficacy;

^^

Failed to suppress to sperm concentration required to enter efficacy by 6 months

a

testosterone enanthate 200 mg/week;

b

testosterone undecanoate 500 mg/month (with 1000 mg loading dose);

c

testosterone implant 800 mg every 4 months with DMAP 300 mg every 3 months

*

Original threshold was 5 M/mL, but data shown here is for those who suppressed to no more than 3 M/mL

Studies pooled and 95% Poisson confidence limits calculated using SAS 9.3 (Cary, NC).