Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 23;7:1241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01241

Table 4.

Wolves’ and dogs’ performance in attention trials.

Species Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4
Wolves (n = 7) 5.43 ± 0.2 (90.5%); 5.29 ± 0.36 (88%); 5.29 ± 0.42 (88%); 5.29 ± 0.36 (88%);
t = 2.02, p < 0.001 t = 6.36, p < 0.001 t = 5.43, p = 0.002 t = 6.36, p < 0.001
Dogs (n = 7) 4 ± 0.3 (67%); 4.43 ± 0.57 (74%); 4.71 ± 0.52 (78.5%); 3.43 ± 0.37 (57%);
t = 3.24, p = 0.02 t = 2.5, p = 0.047 t = 3.29, p = 0.01 t = 1.16, p = 0.29

Mean ± SE for correct choices are indicated in each cell alongside the test statistics comparing performance to chance level.